Skip to main content
MIDDLEMEN™

Ratings

Public ratings, both ways

Account owners rate taskers and us. Taskers rate owners and us. Everyone uses the same six measures, and only people who completed work can leave a review.

See scorecardsAccount Volume & Health

Scorecards

Verified Audited Feedback — Transparent Network Ratings

Middlemen (the agency)

Rated by account owners and taskers

About Middlemen (MM): An audited delegation layer connecting credential hosts with verified, identity-checked AI domain taskers under strict non-custodial session recording and automated percentage splits.
4.6
out of 5.0 overall index
Quality
4.6
Reliability
4.5
Communication
4.4
Compliance
4.9
Pay timeliness
4.8
Accessibility
4.7

Account owners (average)

Rated by taskers and our QA team

About Middlemen (MM): An audited delegation layer connecting credential hosts with verified, identity-checked AI domain taskers under strict non-custodial session recording and automated percentage splits.
4.4
out of 5.0 overall index
Quality
4.3
Reliability
4.4
Communication
4.1
Compliance
4.7
Pay timeliness
4.5
Accessibility
4.2

Taskers (average)

Rated by account owners and our QA team

About Middlemen (MM): An audited delegation layer connecting credential hosts with verified, identity-checked AI domain taskers under strict non-custodial session recording and automated percentage splits.
4.6
out of 5.0 overall index
Quality
4.5
Reliability
4.4
Communication
4.5
Compliance
4.8
Pay timeliness
4.6
Accessibility
4.6

Scores are averages on a 1 to 5 scale, updated nightly. Individual tasker and owner scorecards are shown with an anonymous ID, never a full name.

Audited Account Telemetry & Health Safeguards

Accounts Under Management & Live Health Index

Every account staffed by our verified middleman agency is audited continuously. Below is our transparent public ledger of active accounts, queue distribution, and compliance health.

Direct Message Ops
Total Accounts Staffed
611Active

642 cumulative vetted since launch (95.2% active tasking)

Fleet Health Score
99.4%Good Standing

Zero platform bans across last 180 consecutive operating days

Disqualification Rate
< 0.2%vs 14.8% avg

Industry baseline for unmanaged tasking accounts is 14.8% flags

Avg Account Lifespan
14.8 MoContinuous

Accounts earn weekly Friday payouts with zero downtime

Account Distribution & Health by Specialty

Select a specialty domain to inspect queue health and tasker ratings

Updated: 4h ago
Coding & Software Engineering OptimalAvg Tasker QA: 4.96 / 5.0
STAFFED ACCOUNTS218 Units
HEALTH & UPTIME99.8%
UNRESOLVED FLAGS0
Active Platform Queues:
Python ArchitectureTypeScript/RustCode Review QASWE-Bench
100% Isolated Infrastructure: Dedicated clean residential proxies + locked virtual machines.Zero Session Cross-Contamination

Contact Us / Account Health Desk

Have an account in jeopardy, need a free compliance audit, or want to verify if your platform qualifies for our non-custodial staffing framework? Speak directly with our operations team.

✈
Telegram: Official HubLive 24/7
Live Community Hub • Text admins directly
Join →
Toll-Free 24/7+1 (800) 419-7204Phone or Direct SMS Operations Desksupport@middlemen.ai< 15 min response
Request Account Health Check:
Recent Automated Health & Proxy Pings (Last 30 mins)All sessions secure & unflagged
Account IDAssigned DomainProxy & Session LayerLatencyHealth StatusTime
ACC-8914Python SWEUS-West Clean Res.24ms Verified Healthy2m ago
ACC-6102RLHF WritingUS-East Static RDP19ms Verified Healthy6m ago
ACC-7440Math LogicUK-London Clean Res.31ms Verified Healthy11m ago
ACC-5329Multimodal VideoUS-Central Clean Res.22ms Verified Healthy18m ago
ACC-4118STEM PhysicsCA-Ontario Static RDP28ms Verified Healthy25m ago

What each measure means

Quality
How well the work meets the platform's guidelines, based on QA samples and platform feedback.
Reliability
Showing up for agreed hours, meeting deadlines and giving notice of changes.
Communication
Clear, respectful and timely replies.
Compliance
Following platform rules, session rules and security policies.
Pay timeliness
Paying, or being paid, on the agreed date.
Accessibility
Providing or respecting accommodations without friction.

Reviews

Every review is tied to a completed assignment. We don't edit reviews, and we don't remove negative ones unless they break our review rules.
Verified Audited Feedback — Transparent Network Ratings
Filter reviews

10 reviews shown

  • 𝕏 Post
    "The MM audit was blunt about where our account lacked qualifications rather than promising instant $5k months. We hit a rough patch in week 2 when project rubrics changed overnight, but our tasker adapted and payouts stayed exact."
    Marcus V. Verified
    @marcus_ml_eval
    3 months tasking
  • LinkedIn
    "Screen-reader setup through the isolated VM took an entire afternoon to calibrate—remote desktop lag is real if your internet dips. But unlike direct platforms that just ban without explanation, MM support worked through the latency issue with me until shifts were stable."
    Elena Rostova Verified
    in/elena-rostova-qa
    Verified Specialist
  • Reddit
    "Had a small friction point when a reviewer on our platform flagged a false positive on style conventions. The assigned tasker provided full git diff proofs from the session log within 3 hours and got the quality score restored."
    u/CodeBenchmark_Dev Verified
    r/MachineLearning
    Python Evaluation
  • 𝕏 Post
    "My biggest worry was 2FA fatigue and tax tracking. Having scheduled 4-hour tasking windows means I only confirm login prompts during agreed hours, and the monthly split statements make my accountant's job straightforward."
    Kaelen Chen Verified
    @kaelenc_ai
    Account Owner
  • Discord Community
    "Platform task queues dried up for 4 days in mid-July. Appreciated that MM didn't charge the account owner a shortfall fee and didn't leave taskers stranded without backup queues. The 30% floor is honoured even when projects fluctuate."
    David S. (STEM Annotator) Verified
    discord: @davids_ai#4092
    Tasker Lead
  • Reddit
    "Had one owner who forgot their scheduled shift time and went offline during a 2FA re-auth. MM paused the timer immediately so my hourly metric wasn't penalized, and re-synced us the next morning."
    Tariq M. Verified
    r/remotework
    Tasker · 4 months
  • ★ Trustpilot
    "We run three specialized accounts. Replacing an underperforming tasker took 4 business days, which felt slow when volume was peaking, but the replacement was thoroughly vetted and brought our QA score back up to 98%."
    Horizon Data Labs Verified
    Trustpilot Verified
    Enterprise Host
  • LinkedIn
    "The rubrics on high-tier STEM benchmarks are brutally subjective. It helps immenseley that MM has a peer QA review layer before final submission—saved us from at least three dispute penalties this month alone."
    Sarah Jenkins, PhD Verified
    in/sarah-jenkins-stem
    Math & Reasoning QA
  • Reddit
    "Don't expect free money—the qualification modules are demanding and you will fail if you rush through the reading guidelines. But once cleared, weekly payouts have never been a day late."
    u/LateNightCoder_99 Verified
    r/sidehustle
    Tasker · Part-time
  • 𝕏 Post
    "I was skeptical about anyone touching my account given ban horror stories on Reddit. The virtual machine lockdown with zero clipboard/export permissions gave me the confidence to test. 4 months in, accounts are healthy and in top standing."
    Alex B. Verified
    @alexb_ventures
    Account Owner

← Scroll horizontally to view more platform reviews →

Review rules

  • You can review only after a completed assignment or a closed onboarding.
  • One review per assignment, within 30 days of it ending.
  • No personal details, health information, slurs or threats. Reviews that include them are hidden and the author is asked to rewrite.
  • Reviews can't mention a person's disability, accommodations or identity.
  • We never pay for, write or filter reviews for marketing.

Disputes and appeals

If you think a rating or a QA decision is wrong, you can ask for it to be reviewed.

  1. Step 1: Open an appeal

    From your dashboard, within 30 days. Say what you think is wrong. Written, voice or video — whichever is easiest for you.

  2. Step 2: Independent review

    A staff member who wasn't involved looks at session records, QA notes and both sides' messages. Usually within 5 business days.

  3. Step 3: Decision and second appeal

    You get a written decision with reasons. If you still disagree, a senior reviewer makes a final decision within 10 business days.

While an appeal is open, the disputed rating is hidden from public view. Pay disputes follow the same steps, and we pay any undisputed amount on time.